Issue No. : 1

Issue Date : July October 2010

Project No. : 768

Joint User Complex and Wholesale Fish Market at Area 44, Tuen Mun

Environmental Monitoring & Audit Report (June September 2010)

Prepared By:

Allied Environmental Consultants Ltd.

COMMERCIAL-IN-CONFIDENCE

Issue No. : 1

Issue Date : July October 2010

Project No. : 768

Joint User Complex and Wholesale Fish Market at Area 44, Tuen Mun

Environmental Monitoring & Audit Report (June September 2010)

Prepared By:

Allied Environmental Consultants Ltd.

COMMERCIAL-IN-CONFIDENCE

Author:

Nic H. H. Lam

BSc(Hons) AMHKIOA

Checked: Approved:

Adi LeeWinnie M.W. Ma Grace M. H. Kwok

BEnvMgmt(Hons) MSc AMHKIOAg(Hons) MEng MHKIEIA BEng(Hons) MHKIEIA MHKIOA

MISWA MIAIA MRAPA LEED AP

This report has been prepared by Allied Environmental Consultants Limited with all reasonable skill, care and diligence within the terms of the Agreement with the client, incorporating our General Terms and Conditions of Business and taking account of the resources devoted to it by agreement with the client.

We disclaim any responsibility to the client and others in respect of any matters outside the scope of the above.

This report is confidential to the client and we accept no responsibility of whatsoever nature to third parties to whom this report, or any part thereof, is made known. Any such party relies upon the report at their own risk.

Table of Contents

Table of Contents iiii

List of Tables ii

List of Figures ii

List of Appendices ii

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 121

1. PROJECT BACKGROUND 223

1.1 Project Organization and Contact Personnel 223

2. SENSITIVE RECEIVERS 324

3. CONSTRUCTION WORKS & PROGRAMME 324

4. SUMMARY OF EM&A REQUIREMENT 425

5. MONITORING METHODOLOGY 627

5.1 Monitoring Programme 627

5.2 Air Quality Monitoring 627

5.3 Noise Monitoring 627

6. RESULTS 728

6.1. Air Quality 728

6.2. Noise 829

6.3. Weather Conditions 829

7. SITE INSPECTION & AUDIT 9210

8. Non-compliance, Complaints, Notifications of Summons and Successful Prosecutions 9210

9. OTHERS 10211

10. CONCLUSIONS 10211

List of Tables

Table 1 Contact Details of Key Personnel

Table 2 Interrelationship between Construction Activities and Mitigation Measures

Table 3 Action and Limit Level for Air Quality Impact Monitoring at Yuet Wu Villa

Table 4 Action and Limit Levels for Construction Noise Impact Monitoring

Table 5 Event Action Plan

Table 6 Noise Monitoring Equipment

Table 7 1-hour TSP Monitoring Results

Table 8 24-hour TSP Monitoring Results

Table 9 Noise Monitoring Results

Table 10 Summary of Weather Conditions during the Monitoring Period

Table 11 Summary of Site Inspections

List of Figures

Figure 1 Site Location Plan

Figure 2 Location of Air Quality Monitoring Station

Figure 3 Location of Noise Monitoring Station

Figure 4 Photos of Air Quality Monitoring Station

Figure 5 Photos of Noise Monitoring Station

List of Appendices

Appendix A Detail Schedule of Monitoring Programme

Appendix B Calibration Record of High-Volume TSP Sampler

Appendix C Calibration Certification of the Sound Level Meter and Calibrator

Appendix D Summary of 1-Hour TSP Monitoring Record

Appendix E Summary of 24-Hour TSP Monitoring Record

Appendix F Summary of Noise Monitoring Record

Appendix G Wind Record from Hong Kong Observatory

Appendix H Mitigation Measures Implementation Schedule for Construction Stage

Appendix I Notice of Intended ProsecutionAppendix I Memorandum Notifying the Violation of the Noise Control Ordinance

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Allied Environmental Consultants Limited (AEC) has been appointed to conduct an environmental monitoring and audit (EM&A) program for the proposed Joint User Complex and Wholesale Fish Market at Area 44, Tuen Mun. The construction works were commenced on 31^st July 2008. This report is the twenty-third sixth monthly EM&A report, which detailed the environmental monitoring and audit results recorded during the period from 1^st June September 2010 to 30^th June 30^th September 2010.

Impact environmental monitoring for the proposed Joint User Complex and Wholesale Fish Market at Area 44, Tuen Mun has been carried out on 4^th, 10^th, 16^th, 22^nd and 28^th September 4^th, 10^th, 15^th, 21^st and 26^th June 2010 at Block 15, Yuet Wu Villa. 1-hr TSP and noise monitoring were conducted within the period of 0700-1900 hours, where 24-hr TSP monitoring was conducted continuously for a 24-hour period.

1-hour TSP monitoring results at the monitoring location ranged from 8283£gg/m³ to 182120£gg/m³ with an average of 11797£gg/m³. 24-hour TSP monitoring results ranged from 7458£gg/m³ to 8479£gg/m³ with an average of 7767£gg/m³.

Noise monitoring results at the monitoring location ranged from 60.9dB2dB(A) to 62.71.9dB(A) with an average of 61.6dB1dB(A).

Based on the monitoring results, the air quality and construction noise level complied with the environmental requirements in EM&A Manual. There were no breaches of the action and limit levels.

In this reporting period, there was follow-up actiona notice of intended prosecution to W. Hing Construction Company Limited from EPD regarding the non-complianceuse of powered mechanical equipment, for the purpose of carrying out construction work recorded other than percussive piling in respect of which a construction noise permit was not in force on 16^th May 2010 at Joint-User complex and Wholesale Fish Market in Area 44, Tuen Mun, New Territories. during site inspection of the EPD. The contractor carried out construction works with powered mechanical equipment on 16^th May 2010 (Sunday) without Construction Noise Permit (CNP). Memorandum from EPD (Ref.: EP/RW/0000/080262 dated 8^th June 2010) was received reminding the main contractor to abide by the NCO and supply to EPD the extract of the contract documents showing the name of the appointed contractor/subcontractor of the site, the project commencement date and the anticipated completion date, site layout plan showing the location and boundary of the site; and site diary of date. The contractor had provided the aforementioned documents to the EPD for their follow-up action.

No other complaint, inspection notice, notification of summons or prosecution was received.

Construction activities will be undertaken in July September 2010 include internal finishing works, installation of Kalzip Roof, C&J installation works, metal works installation, dismantling of hoarding, last manhole connection works, reinstatement of existing concrete pavement outside site boundary, installation of fender, dismantling of bamboo scaffolding, external landscape works, 2nd or final fixing for E&M services works and T&C for E&M services works.

defects rectification for internal / external finishing works, installation of signage works, carrying out of additional finishing works, handover preparation works and installation of additional E&M services works

Potential environmental impacts include dust generation from stockpiles of dusty materials, concrete works and the internal finishes; noise from operation of the equipments, runoff from concrete works, drainage works and the storage of various C&D and chemical wastes. The Contractor should properly implement the required environmental mitigation measures as per the implementation schedule in the EM&A manual to ensure no significant adverse environmental impacts to be arisen from the construction works. The Contractor was reminded to maintain good housekeeping throughout the construction phase.

1. PROJECT BACKGROUND

A Joint User Complex and Wholesale Fish Market (WFM Complex) at Area 44 in Tuen Mun is proposed to be designed and built by Architectural Services Department on behalf of Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department, Marine Department, Home Affairs Department, and Food and Environmental Hygiene Department of the Hong Kong SAR. The WFM Complex is to provide a permanent site for the relocation of the existing temporary wholesale fish market at Tuen Mun Area 27 and to accommodate a community hall, a dragon boat racing spectator stand, and other community facilities for public use. The proposed development is a 3-storey complex to accommodate a wholesale fish market, a public toilet, a refuse collection point and a marine refuse collection point at the ground floor, a community hall on the first floor, and a dragon boat race spectator stand with landscaped deck on roof level. The proposed Wholesale Fish Market is categorized as a designated project under the Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (EIAO) and therefore a detailed Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA-085/2002) has been conducted in year 2002 and an Environmental Permit (EP-296/2007) was issued by Environmental Protection Department in December 2007.

The subject site is located at Castle Peak Bay of Tuen Mun given in Figure 1. The subject site is bounded to the north by a future local open space presently used as a temporary car park, to the east by Castle Peak Bay typhoon shelter, to the south by a future lorry park and to the west by Wu Shan Road. Yuet Wu Villa being the nearest residential establishment is located at around 85m from the site boundary.

1.1 Project Organization and Contact Personnel

Key personnel and contact particulars are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1 Contact Details of Key Personnel

Role	Department / Company	Names	Contact Number	Fax Number
Lead User Department	Agriculture, Fisheries, and Conservation Department	Mr. K.H. Chan Ms. Louise Li	2150 7092 2150 7104	2314 2866
Environmental Permit Holder	Architecture Services Department	Mr. S.W. Chow Ms. Susana Chan	2867 3716 2867 3706	2523 9622
Architect	P&T Architects and Engineers Ltd.	Ms. Sarah Ng Ms. Vivian Law	2835 3548 2832 3046	2891 3834
Main Contractor	W. Hing Construction Co. Ltd.	Mr. Andy Chan Mr. Jim Lee	9630 7404 6105 4076	8343 9188
Environmental Team Leader	Allied Environmental Consultants Ltd.	Ms. Grace Kwok	2815 7028	2815 5399
Independent Environmental Checker	Cinotech Consultants Ltd.	Dr. Priscilla Choy	2151 2089	3107 1388

2. SENSITIVE RECEIVERS

Air Sensitive Receivers (ASRs) within 500m include Yuet Wu Villa, lawn bowling field, tennis court, which are less than 100m away from the subject site. Tuen Mun Wu Hong Clinic is located to the west at about 100m to the site boundary. Two secondary schools, Ka Chi Secondary School and South Tuen Mun Government Secondary School, are approximately 300m to the south of the site boundary.

Noise Sensitive Receivers (NSRs) within 300m are Yuet Wu Villa, Siu Hei Court, Yan Chai Hospital Low Chan Chor Si Primary School and Wu King Estate. The nearest NSR will be Block 15 of Yuet Wu Villa.

3. CONSTRUCTION WORKS & PROGRAMME

The major works undertaken and/or completed during the monitoring period are listed below:

- Stormwater last manhole connection along Wu Shan Road;

- Reinstatement of concrete pavement along Wu Shan Road;

- Installation of steel & metal works, 4) Installation of joinery & carpentary works, 5) Internal & external finishing works, 6) Landscaping works, 7) Plumbing & drainage works and 8) E&M final fixing & T&C works;

- Defects rectification for internal / external finishing works;

- Construction of additional planter RC wall;

- Installation of minor steel & metal works;

- Installation of joinery & carpentery works;

- Planting work by ASD term contractor;

- Installation of signage works;

- Water tightness test for kalzip roof;

- Handover preparation works; and 

- Installation of additional E&M services works.

Table 2 shows the interrelationship between construction activities and environmental mitigation measures for the reporting month.

Table 2 Interrelationship between Construction Activities and Mitigation Measures

Construction Works	Major Environmental Impact	Mitigation Measures
Concrete works	Air, noise and water quality impacts	Well-maintained plants were used and waste water were reused when practicable, cement bags were properly covered and use indoors as practicable
E&M services and planting works	Water quality impacts	Waste water were reused when practicable
Internal & external finishes and installation works	Noise impacts	Closely monitoring of noise impacts

4. SUMMARY OF EM&A REQUIREMENT

For regular impact monitoring, the sampling frequency of at least once in every six-days, shall be strictly observed at the monitoring station for 24-hr TSP monitoring. For 1-hr TSP monitoring, the sampling frequency of at least three times in every six-days should be undertaken when the highest dust impact occurs. For noise monitoring, one set of measurement between 0700-1900 hours on normal weekdays. L_{eq (30 min)} shall be used as the monitoring parameter.

From baseline monitoring results, the proposed Action and Limit Levels for air quality are summarized in Table 3. The average baseline 1-hr TSP value of 129£gg/m³ and 24-hr TSP value of 65£gg/m³ measured at Block 15, Yuet Wu Villa was used to determine the action and limit level for air quality impact monitoring. The proposed Action and Limit Levels for construction noise are summarized in Table 4.

Table 3 Action and Limit Level for Air Quality Impact Monitoring at Yuet Wu Villa

Parameters	Baseline Level (£gg/m^33)	Action Level (£gg/m^33)	Limit Level (£gg/m^33)
24-Hour TSP Level	65	173	260
1-Hour TSP Level	129	334	500

Table 4 Action and Limit Levels for Construction Noise Impact Monitoring

Time Period	Action Level	Limit Level
Daytime (0700-1900 hours) on weekdays	When one documented compliant is received	Dwelling 75dB(A)^11 School 70dB(A)^11 (65dB(A) during examinations)^11
1900-2300 on any day and 0700-2300 on Sunday and general holidays, for use of PME2	When one documented compliant is received	65dB(A)^33
All days during the night-time (2300-0700 hours) ^2 2	When one documented compliant is received	50dB(A)^33

Note: 1. Construction noise criteria stipulated in the TM-EIAO

2. A Construction Noise Permit (CNP) shall be required for the carrying out of the construction work during the restricted hours (1900-2300 on any day and 0700-2300 on Sunday and general holidays, for use of PME; and All days during the night-time (2300-0700 hours))

3. Area sensitivity rating of the monitoring location is ¡§B¡¨.

¹

Should non-compliance of the above Action and Limit levels occurs, the contractor shall undertake corresponding in accordance with the proposed Event Action Plan given in the EM&A Manual. A summarized general Event Action Plan is given in Table 5. Details should be referred to the Event Action Plan in the EM&A Manual.

Table 5 Event Action Plan

Level	Step 1	Step 2	Step 3
Action	l Identify source l Check monitoring data and working methods	l Contact project manager to discuss and implement remedial action l Rectify any unacceptable practice l Amend working methods if appropriate l If exceedance continues, commence additional monitoring	l Notify client/project manager following correct of the situation l Cease additional monitoring if exceedance stops
Limit	l Identify source l Notify client/project manager l Check monitoring data and working methods l Repeat measurement to confirm finding l Commence additional monitoring	l Take immediate action to avoid further exceedance l Submit proposal for remedial actions to client/project manager within 3 working days l Implement the agreed proposal l If exceedance continues, amend and resubmit the proposal	l Notify client/project manager following correction of the situation l Cease additional monitoring if exceedance stops

5. MONITORING METHODOLOGY

5.1 Monitoring Programme

Air quality monitoring and noise monitoring were conducted at Block 15, Yuet Wu Villa on 4^th, 10^th, 16^th, 22^nd and 28^th September 4^th, 10^th, 15^th, 21^st and 26^th June 2010. The air quality monitoring and noise monitoring for July October 2010 will be scheduled on 4^th, 9^th, 15^th, 21^st and 27^th October 2^nd, 8^th, 14^th, 20^th, 26^th and 31^st July 2010. Appendix A displayed the detail schedule of the monitoring programme. Air quality monitoring station was set up at the roof top of the residential block and noise monitoring was conducted at 1.2m above ground level in front of the residential block and at the junction of Wu Sau Street and Wu On Street as given in Figures 2 and 3. Figures 4 and 5 show photos taken during monitoring at the two locations.

5.2 Air Quality Monitoring

1-hour and 24-hour TSP air quality monitoring was conducted at the designated air quality monitoring location using a High Volume TSP Sampler (Model No: Anderson GMWS-2310 ACCU-VOL) at the designated location. The Calibration Record of the High-Volume TSP Sampler is given in Appendix B. 24-hour TSP samples were taken every six days. 1-hour TSP samples were taken three times a day between 0700-1900 hours. The weighing of the filter paper used in the monitoring was undertaken by ALS Laboratory Group Environmental Division. (HOKLAS Registration No.: 066)

5.3 Noise Monitoring

Noise monitoring was conducted at the designated noise monitoring location between 0700-1900 hours using a sound level meter which complies with the International Electrotechnical Commission Publications 651:1979 (Type 1) and 804:1985 (Type 1). Noise instrumentation details are given in Table 6 and the Calibration Certificate for the sound level meter and calibrator is given in Appendix C.

Table 6 Noise Monitoring Equipment

Manufacturer	Type/Model No.	Equipment
RION	Model NL 31	Precision Sound Level Analyser with windshield
RION	Model NC 73	Calibrator
AZ Instrument	AZ Instrument 8908	Thermo-anemometer

Noise level measurements were recorded in terms of thirty minutes A-weighted equivalent continuous sound pressure level (L_eq(30min)) on a daily basis. The sound level meter was calibrated immediately prior to and following each noise measurement. The meter was mounted on a tripod at a height of 1.2m and the microphone was positioned at 1m away the building façade of the noise monitoring station facing the construction site.

Noise measurements were not made in the presence of fog, rain, and wind with a steady speed exceeding 5m/s or wind with gusts exceeding 10m/s. The wind speed was checked with a portable anemometer capable of measuring the wind speed in m/s.

6. RESULTS

6.1. Air Quality

1-hour and 24-hour TSP monitoring results are summarized in Tables 7 and 8 and serve as the basis for determining the action and limit levels. The minimum and maximum 1-hour TSP measured at Yuet Wu Villa was 8283£gg/m³ and 182120£gg/m³ respectively with an average of 11797£gg/m³. The minimum and maximum 24-hour TSP measured was 7458£gg/m³ and 8479£gg/m³ respectively with an average of 7767£gg/m³. Summary of air quality monitoring record is provided in Appendices D and E.

³

Table 7 1-Hour TSP Monitoring Results

Date	1-hr TSP (£gg/m3)				Average (£gg/m^33)
	Reading 1	Reading 2	Reading 3	Average
4^th September 20104th June 2010	15991	182103	15494	16596	11797
10^th September 201010th June 2010	128100	12694	11691	12395
16^th September 201015th June 2010	115120	10698	11595	112104
22^nd September 201021st June 2010	9593	95111	9193	9499
28^th September 201026th June 2010	8286	92110	10183	9293

Table 8 24-Hour TSP Monitoring Results

Date	24-hr TSP (£gg/m^3m3)
4^th September 20104th June 2010	8470
10^th September 201010th June 2010	7978
16^th September 201015th June 2010	7869
22^nd September 201021st June 2010	7858
28^th September 201026th June 2010	7459
Average	7767

6.2. Noise

Noise monitoring results in terms of L_eq(30min), L_10(30min) L_90(30min) measured at the designated noise monitoring location are summarized in Table 9. L_10(30min) and L_90(30min) represent sound levels that are exceeded 10% and 90% of the time respectively. Normally, L_10(30min) measurements can be considered as the average peak levels, whilst L_90(30min) levels can be considered as the average background noise levels.

During the reporting month, the minimum and maximum noise level measured at Yuet Wu Villa was 60.9dB2dB(A) L_eq(30min) and 62.71.9dB(A) L_eq(30min) respectively with an average of 61.6dB1dB(A) L_eq(30min). No exceedance was recorded in this reporting period. Summary of noise monitoring record will be provided in Appendix F.

_10(30mins)

Table 9 Noise Monitoring Results

Date	L10(30mins) (dB(A))	L90(30mins) (dB(A))	Leq (30mins) (dB(A))
4^th September 20102^nd July 2010	62.763.4	59.658.7	61.72
10^th September 20108^th July 2010	63.2.77	57.69.8	61.0.22
16^th September 201014^th July 2010	6363.2.7	59.78.9	61.21.7
22^nd September 201020^th July 2010	6263.77	578.2	60.21.9
28^th September 201026^th July 2010	63.91.9	60.257.9	6260.7
31^st July 2010	62.9	58.9	61.7
Average	63.04	59.28.3	61.14

6.3. Weather Conditions

Weather data of the monitoring station were obtained from the nearest Hong Kong Observatory (HKO) Tuen Mun automatic weather station located at Tuen Mun Town Park (63 mPD). Table 10 summarizes the wind data during the monitoring dates. Wind record from HKO is shown in Appendix G.

Table 10 Summary of Weather Conditions during the Monitoring Period

Date	Weather	Prevailing Wind direction	Daily Average Wind speed (m/s)
4^th September 20104th June 2010	CloudyCloudy	NSE	1.822.92
10^th September 201010th June 2010	CloudyCloudy	WN	1.780.89
16^th September 201015th June 2010	SunnyCloudy	SSE	1.853.34
22^nd September 201021st June 2010	CloudyCloudy	SE	2.602.80
28^th September 201026th June 2010	SunnyCloudy	SESE	2.252.38

7. SITE INSPECTION & AUDIT

4 site inspections were conducted by the Environmental Team (ET) in this reporting period. Major observations by the ET, actions by the Contractor and outcome are summarized in the Table 11.

Table 11 Summary of Site Inspections

Date	Observations	Action taken by Contractor			Outcome
3^rd September 20104th June 2010	No observations during inspection.No observations during inspection.	Contractor was required to keep up with the mitigation measures.Contractor was required to keep up with the mitigation measures.			Nil.Nil.
10^th September 20109th July 2010	Stockpile of sand was not properly covered.Haul road appeared dry.	The contractor was advised to cover the stockpiles after work.Contractor was requested to increase the frequency of watering.			The situation was rectified after work immediately.Sufficient water spraying was given to dry haul road.
20^th August 2010	No observations during inspection.		Contractor was required to keep up with the mitigation measures.	Nil.
17^th September 201018th June 2010	No observations during inspection.Stockpiles of sand were not properly covered.	Contractor was required to keep up with the mitigation measures.Contractor was requested to provide covering.			Nil.Covering was given to the stockpiles of sand.
24^th September 201025th June 2010	No observations during inspection.Stockpiles of sand and rubbish were not properly covered.	Contractor was required to keep up with the mitigation measures.Contractor was requested to provide covering.			Nil.Covering was given to the stockpiles of sand and rubbish.

During site inspections in the reporting month, no non-conformance of implementation of environmental mitigation measures was identified. All environmental mitigation measures for construction stages stated in approved EIA Report, EM&A Manual and Environmental Permit shall be carried out throughout the whole construction period as shown in Appendix H.

8. Non-compliance, Complaints, Notifications of Summons and Successful Prosecutions

In this reporting period, there was a notice of intended prosecution to W. Hing Construction Company Limited from EPD dated 6^th September 2010 regarding the use of powered mechanical equipment, for the purpose of carrying out construction work other than percussive piling in respect of which a construction noise permit was not in force on 16^th May 2010 at Joint-User complex and Wholesale Fish Market in Area 44, Tuen Mun, New Territories The detail of notice referred to Appendix I.In this reporting period, there was follow-up action from EPD regarding the non-compliance recorded on 16^th May 2010 during site inspection of the EPD. The contractor carried out construction works with powered mechanical equipment on 16^th May 2010 (Sunday) without Construction Noise Permit (CNP). Memorandum from EPD (Ref.: EP/RW/0000/080262 dated 8^th June 2010) was received reminding the main contractor to abide by the NCO and supply to EPD the extract of the contract documents showing the name of the appointed contractor/subcontractor of the site, the project commencement date and the anticipated completion date, site layout plan showing the location and boundary of the site; and site diary of date. The contractor had provided the aforementioned documents to the EPD for their follow-up action.

No other complaint, inspection notice, notification of summons or prosecution was received.

9. OTHERS

In the reporting month, A total of 1,402.21no tonnes of inert C&D material was disposed of at public fill. A total of 149.4 46.63 tonnes of waste including general refuse and non-inert C&D wastes such as timber and bamboo were disposed to landfill. No chemical waste was transported off site in this reporting period.

10. CONCLUSIONS

Environmental monitoring has been carried out for the proposed Joint User Complex and Wholesale Fish Market at Area 44, Tuen Mun. 1-hour and 24-hour TSP air quality monitoring and noise monitoring was conducted at Block 15, Yuet Wu Villa during the period from 1^st June September 2010 to 30^th June 30^th September 2010.

The average 1-hour TSP level is 11797£gg/m³ and average 24-hour TSP level is 7767£gg/m³. For impact noise monitoring, the average L_eq(30min) is 61.6dB1dB(A). All monitoring results complied with the relevant action and limit levels.

In this reporting period, there was a notice of intended prosecution to W. Hing Construction Company Limited from EPD regarding the use of powered mechanical equipment, for the purpose of carrying out construction work other than percussive piling in respect of which a construction noise permit was not in force on 16^th May 2010 at Joint-User complex and Wholesale Fish Market in Area 44, Tuen Mun, New Territories.

In this reporting period, there was follow-up action from EPD regarding the non-compliance recorded on 16^th May 2010 during site inspection of the EPD. The contractor carried out construction works with powered mechanical equipment on 16^th May 2010 (Sunday) without Construction Noise Permit (CNP). Memorandum from EPD (Ref.: EP/RW/0000/080262 dated 8^th June 2010) was received reminding the main contractor to abide by the NCO and supply to EPD the extract of the contract documents showing the name of the appointed contractor/subcontractor of the site, the project commencement date and the anticipated completion date, site layout plan showing the location and boundary of the site; and site diary of date. The contractor had provided the aforementioned documents to the EPD for their follow-up action.

No other complaint, inspection notice, notification of summons or prosecution was received.