Issue
No. : 1
Issue
Date : January 2012
Project
No. : 768 (2)
Joint User Complex and Wholesale Fish
Market at Area 44,
Environmental Monitoring & Audit Report for Operational Phase
(December 2011)
Prepared By:
Allied
Environmental
Consultants Ltd.
COMMERCIAL-IN-CONFIDENCE
Issue No. : 1
Issue Date : January 2012
Project No. : 768 (2)
Joint User Complex and Wholesale Fish
Market at Area 44,
Environmental Monitoring & Audit Report for Operational Phase
(December 2011)
Prepared By:
Allied
Environmental Consultants Ltd.
COMMERCIAL-IN-CONFIDENCE
Author:
Ronan L. H. Chan
BSc
Checked: Approved:
Nic H. H. Lam Grace M.
BSc(Hons) AMHKIOA AMHKIEIA BEng(Hons) MHKIEIA
MHKIOA
MISWA
This report has been prepared by Allied Environmental Consultants Limited
with all reasonable skill, care and diligence within the terms of the Agreement
with the client, incorporating our General Terms and Conditions of Business and
taking account of the resources devoted to it by agreement with the client.
We disclaim any responsibility to the client and others in respect of any
matters outside the scope of the above.
This report is confidential to the client and we accept no responsibility
of whatsoever nature to third parties to whom this report, or any part thereof,
is made known. Any such party
relies upon the report at their own risk.
Table of Contents iii
List of Tables ii
List of Figures ii
List of Appendices ii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 21
1. PROJECT BACKGROUND 2
1.1 Project Organization and Contact Personnel 2
2. SENSITIVE RECEIVERS 23
3. SUMMARY OF EM&A REQUIREMENT 23
4. MONITORING METHODOLOGY 26
4.1 Monitoring Programme 26
4.2 Odour Patrol 26
4.3 Noise Monitoring 27
5. RESULTS 28
5.1. Operational Phase Odour Patrol 28
5.2. Noise 29
6. IMPLEMENTATION
OF MITIGATION MEASURES 210
7. Non-compliance, Complaints, Notifications of Summons and
Successful Prosecutions 210
8. CONCLUSIONS 210
Table
1 Contact
Details of Key Personnel
Table 2 Action and Limit Level for Operational
Phase Odour Patrol
Table 3 Event/Action
Plan for Operational Phase Odour Patrol
Table 4 Action
and Limit Levels for Operational Phase Noise Monitoring
Table 5 Event/Action
Plan for Operational Phase Noise Monitoring
Table 6 Meteorological Data Monitoring Equipment
Table 7 Noise
Monitoring Equipment
Table 8 Results
of Operational Phase Odour Patrol
Table 9 Noise
Monitoring Results
Figure
1 Site
Location Plan
Figure 2 Location
Plan of Operational Phase Odour Patrol and Sniffing Locations
Figure 3 Location
of Noise Monitoring Station
Figure 4 Photo
of Noise Monitoring Station
Appendix A Detail Schedule of Odour
Patrol and Noise Monitoring
Appendix
B Calibration Certification of
the Sound Level Meter and Calibrator
Appendix
C Summary and Graphical Plot
of
Noise Monitoring Record
Appendix
D Mitigation Measures Implementation Schedule for Operational Stage
Allied Environmental Consultants Limited
(AEC) has been appointed to conduct an environmental monitoring and audit
(EM&A) program for the Joint User Complex and Wholesale
Fish Market (WFM) at Area 44,
Impact environmental monitoring for the Joint User Complex and Wholesale Fish Market at Area
44, Tuen Mun has been carried out at Yuet Wu Villa. Odour patrol and noise monitoring were conducted on 1st,
8th, 12th, 22nd and 30th December
2011. Both monitoring were conducted
within the period of 0300-0630 hours.
The odour intensity ratings on 1st,
8th, 12th, 22nd and 30th December
2011 were 1-No Odour.
The minimum and maximum average noise level measured at Yuet Wu Villa was 50.9dB(A) Leq(5min) and 55.3dB(A) Leq(5min) respectively.
Based on the monitoring results, the odour monitoring
complied with the environmental requirements in EM&A Manual. The measured monitoring results were higher than the predicted noise
levels due to the increment of noise level from ambient background noise
levels.
In the reporting month, no
non-compliance,
complaint, inspection notice,
notification of summons or prosecution was received.
There was no major change in the operation of WFM.
Monitoring works had been conducted for 12 months of
the operational of the Wholesale Fish Market as stated in EM&A Manual and
the approved Environmental Permit EP-296/2007. The EM&A requirements were
fulfilled and the completion of EM&A programme shall be notified to the
EPD. The operation phase EM&A
programme was completed and no further works should be carried out in future.
A Joint User
Complex and Wholesale Fish Market (WFM Complex) at Area
The subject site is located at Castle Peak
Bay of Tuen Mun given in Figure 1. The subject site is bounded to the north by a future local
open space presently used as a temporary car park, to the east by
Key personnel and contact particulars are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1 Contact
Details of Key Personnel
Role |
Department
/ Company |
Names |
Contact
Number |
Fax
Number |
Lead User
Department |
Agriculture,
Fisheries, and Conservation Department |
|
2150 7092 2150 7104 |
2314 2866 |
Environmental
Permit Holder |
Architecture
Services Department |
|
2867 3716 2867 3706 |
2523 9622 |
Environmental
Team Leader |
Allied
Environmental Consultants Ltd. |
|
2815 7028 |
2815 5399 |
Independent
Environmental Checker |
Cinotech
Consultants Ltd. |
|
2151 2089 |
3107 1388 |
Air Sensitive Receivers (ASRs) within
Noise Sensitive Receivers (NSRs) within
For regular
impact monitoring, odour patrol shall be carried out on a regular basis during
the first year of operation. Odour patrol shall be carried out once a week
during the first three months of operation of the WFM. The odour patrol
frequency shall be reviewed afterwards.
According to the
approved EM&A Manual, the Action and Limit Levels for operational phase
odour patrol are summarized in Table 2.
Table 2
Action and Limit Levels for Operational Phase Odour Patrol
Parameter |
Action Level |
Limit Level |
Perceived odour intensity |
Higher than or equal to Level 3 |
Level 5 |
Incidence
of odour complaints |
Any incidence of odour complaint received |
Two or
more odour complaints received within one month |
Should non-compliance of the above Action and Limit levels occurs, the Fish Marketing Organization (FMO) shall undertake corresponding in accordance with the Event/Action Plan given in the
EM&A Manual. An Event/Action Plan for operational phase
odour monitoring is given in Table 3.
Table 3
Event/Action
Plan for Operational Phase Odour Patrol
EVENT |
ACTION |
||
WFM Management (FMO) |
AFCD |
ASD |
|
Action Level |
1.
Identify source/reason of odour nuisance or
complaint 2.
Inform AFCD 3.
Repeat odour patrol to confirm finding 4.
Discuss with AFCD on remedial actions
required |
1.
Identify the source/reason of odour
nuisance or complaint within one week 2.
Rectify any unacceptable practice 3.
Amend working method if appropriate 4.
Inform ASD if cause of nuisance or
complaint is considered to be caused by civil or E&M design problems¡¦ 5.
Implement amended working methods 6.
Contact complaintant within 10 working days
to inform the cause of nuisance and action taken |
1.
Assist AFCD to find the cause of the
complaint 2.
Modify or improve design as appropriate |
Limit Level |
1.
Identify source/reason of odour nuisance or
complaint 2.
Inform AFCD 3.
Repeat odour patrol to confirm finding 4.
Discuss with AFCD on remedial actions
required including retrofitting the scrubber system 5.
Increase odour patrol frequency to daily 6.
If the perceived odour intensity reduces,
cease additional odour patrol |
1.
Carry out investigation to identify the
source/reason of nuisance or odour complaint 2.
Rectify any unacceptable practice 3.
Amend working method if appropriate 4.
Inform ASD if cause of nuisance or
complaint is considered to be caused by civil or E&M design problems 5.
Ensure remedial measures are properly
implemented 6.
To liaise with ASD on additional odour
measures including retrofitting the scrubber system. If odour nuisance
continues, consider what portion of the work is responsible for the high
level of odour intensity and stop that portion of work until the exceedance
is abated 7.
Contact complainant within 10 days to
inform the cause of nuisance and action taken |
1.
Assist AFCD to find the cause of the
nuisance or complaint 2.
Modify or improve the design of the odour
measures including the retrofitting of scrubber system 3.
Assist AFCD to formulate remedial actions |
For noise
monitoring, the operational noise level shall be measured weekly in terms of
the A-weighted equivalent continuous sound pressure level (Leq). Leq(5min) shall be used as monitoring parameter for the period from 0300 to 0630
hours. Each set of measurement shall include at least 3 consecutive Leq(5min) results. As supplementary information for data auditing, statistical
results such as L10(5min) and L90(5min) shall also be obtained for reference.
Additional noise
monitoring shall not be given for marine traffic noise. With consideration given to the selected
access route, which represent the worst-scenarios in terms of distance to
nearby receivers, the highest marine traffic noise levels at nearby sensitive
receivers are found to be below the prevailing background noise level they are
currently exposed to. The operation of the proposed WFM is not expected to
generate additional marine traffic noise within the typhoon shelter and will
not cause any deterioration to the existing noise climate in the vicinity of
the typhoon shelter.
From baseline monitoring results, the Action and Limit Levels for operational phase noise monitoring are
summarized in Table 4.
Table 4
Action and Limit Levels for Operational Phase Noise Monitoring
Time
Period |
Action
Level |
Limit Level |
All days during the night-time
(2300-0700 hours) |
When one documented compliant is received |
58dB(A) |
Should non-compliance of the above Action and Limit levels occurs, the Fish Marketing Organization (FMO) shall undertake corresponding in accordance with the Event Action Plan
given in the EM&A Manual. An
Event/Action Plan for operational
phase noise monitoring is given in Table 5.
Table 5
Event/Action
Plan for Operational Phase Noise Monitoring
EVENT |
ACTION |
||
WFM Management (FMO) |
AFCD |
ASD |
|
Action Level |
1.
Notify AFCD 2.
Identify source 3.
Discuss with AFCD and formulate remedial
measures 4.
Increase monitoring frequency to check
mitigation effectiveness |
1.
Identify the source 2.
Rectify any unacceptable practice 3.
Amend working method if appropriate 4.
Inform ASD if cause of nuisance or
complaint is considered to be caused by civil or E&M design problems¡¦ 5.
Implement amended working methods 6.
Ensure remedial measures are properly
implemented |
1.
Assist AFCD to find the cause of the exceedance 2.
Modify or improve design as appropriate |
Limit Level |
1.
Notify AFCD 2.
Identify source 3.
Repeat measurement to confirm finding 4.
Increase monitoring frequency 5.
Discuss with AFCD and formulate remedial
measures 6.
Assess effectiveness of the remedial
actions 7.
If exceedance stops, cease additional monitoring |
1.
Carry out investigation to identify the
source 2.
Rectify any unacceptable practice 3.
Amend working method if appropriate 4.
Inform ASD if cause of nuisance or
complaint is considered to be caused by civil or E&M design problems 5.
Implement amended working methods 6.
Ensure remedial measures are properly
implemented 7.
If exceedance continues, consider what
portion of the work is responsible and stop that portion of work until the
exceedance is abated |
1.
Assist AFCD to find the cause of the exceedance 2.
Modify or improve the design as appropriate 3.
Assist AFCD to formulate remedial actions |
Odour patrol
and noise monitoring were conducted around Yuet Wu Villa and at Block 15, Yuet Wu
Villa respectively on 1st, 8th, 12th,
22nd and 30th December 2011. Appendix A displayed the detail schedule of the odour patrol and noise monitoring.
Odour patrol shall be conducted to
investigate if there is any potential for odour nuisance due to the operation
of the Wholesale Fish Market. The patrol shall be carried out by a team of at
least two personnel during the peak hours for trading operation at the WFM from
3:00 to 6:
The area covered by the odour patrol shall
include Air Sensitive Receivers in the vicinity of the WFM, namely
Table 6 Meteorological
Data Monitoring Equipment
Monitoring
Equipment |
Brand
Name & Model No. |
Serial
No. |
Data
monitored |
Weather meter |
AZ 8909 |
9174569 |
Wind
Speed, wind direction, temperature and relative humidity |
During the patrol, the patrol officers shall
identify if there was any odour characterised of that emitted from the WFM and
assess the intensity of the odour perceived individually. The following odour
intensity rating shall be adopted in the assessment:
1.
-
no odour
2.
-
not unpleasant
3.
-
slightly unpleasant
4.
-
unpleasant
5.
-
very unpleasant
Mean value of the odour intensity ratings
assessed by the patrol team shall be reported. Location of odour assessment,
temperature, wind speed, wind direction, relative humidity and time of patrol
shall also be recorded.
If the mean odour intensity rating was higher
than or equal to level 3, the patrol officers should investigate from where the
odour was originated and identify the source of odour emission, if possible.
Noise monitoring was conducted
at the designated noise monitoring location between 0700-1900 hours using a sound
level meter which complies with the International Electrotechnical Commission
Publications 651:1979 (Type 1) and 804:1985 (Type 1). Noise instrumentation
details are given in Table 7 and the Calibration Certificate for the sound level meter
and calibrator is given in Appendix B. Noise monitoring was conducted at
Table 7 Noise
Monitoring Equipment
Manufacturer |
Type/Model
No. |
Equipment |
Svantek |
Svan-959 |
Precision
Sound Level Analyser with windshield |
Svantek |
SV |
Sound Level Calibrator |
AZ |
AZ 8909 |
Weather Meter |
Noise level measurements
were recorded in terms of five minutes A-weighted equivalent continuous sound
pressure level (Leq(5min)) on
a weekly basis. The sound level meter was calibrated immediately prior to and
following each noise measurement. The meter was mounted on a tripod at a height
of
Noise measurements were not made in the presence of fog, rain, and wind
with a steady speed exceeding
Results of
operational phase odour patrol are summarized
in Table 8. The odour
intensity ratings on 1st, 8th, 12th, 22nd
and 30th December 2011 were 1-No Odour.
Table 8 Results of Operational Phase Odour Patrol
Date |
Arrival Time |
Location |
Temperature (¢J) |
Wind Speed
(m/s) |
Wind Direction |
Relative Humidity (%) |
Patrol Officer (s) |
Sniffing Location |
Odour Intensity Rating |
1st
December 2011 |
05:44 |
|
20.1 |
0.5 |
N |
66.5 |
Cheng Kam Wing |
L1 |
1 |
06:08 |
19.2 |
3.0 |
E |
71.8 |
L2 |
1 |
|||
06:01 |
19.4 |
0.6 |
NE |
71.2 |
L3 |
1 |
|||
05:44 |
20.1 |
0.5 |
N |
66.5 |
|
L1 |
1 |
||
06:08 |
19.2 |
3.0 |
E |
71.8 |
L2 |
1 |
|||
06:01 |
19.4 |
0.6 |
NE |
71.2 |
L3 |
1 |
|||
8th
December 2011 |
05:21 |
|
20.2 |
1.9 |
N |
73.2 |
Cheng Kam Wing |
L1 |
1 |
05:36 |
20.0 |
1.2 |
N |
74.7 |
L2 |
1 |
|||
05:41 |
19.9 |
2.5 |
NE |
75.5 |
L3 |
1 |
|||
05:21 |
20.2 |
1.9 |
N |
73.2 |
|
L1 |
1 |
||
05:36 |
20.0 |
1.2 |
N |
74.7 |
L2 |
1 |
|||
05:41 |
19.9 |
2.5 |
NE |
75.5 |
L3 |
1 |
|||
12th
December 2011 |
05:20 |
Yuet Wu Villa |
10.9 |
1.4 |
N |
44.1 |
Cheng Kam Wing |
L1 |
1 |
05:43 |
10.6 |
3.5 |
NE |
47.5 |
L2 |
1 |
|||
05:35 |
10.7 |
2.6 |
N |
47.9 |
L3 |
1 |
|||
05:20 |
10.9 |
1.4 |
N |
44.1 |
|
L1 |
1 |
||
05:43 |
10.6 |
3.5 |
NE |
47.5 |
L2 |
1 |
|||
05:35 |
10.7 |
2.6 |
N |
47.9 |
L3 |
1 |
|||
22nd
December 2011 |
05:47 |
Yuet Wu Villa |
18.4 |
1.6 |
E |
51.1 |
Cheng Kam Wing |
L1 |
1 |
06:11 |
17.1 |
2.1 |
E |
55.2 |
L2 |
1 |
|||
06:05 |
17.1 |
1.0 |
NE |
54.8 |
L3 |
1 |
|||
05:47 |
18.4 |
1.6 |
E |
51.1 |
|
L1 |
1 |
||
06:11 |
17.1 |
2.1 |
E |
55.2 |
L2 |
1 |
|||
06:05 |
17.1 |
1.0 |
NE |
54.8 |
L3 |
1 |
|||
30th
December 2011 |
06:14 |
Yuet Wu Villa |
15.9 |
1.9 |
E |
68.9 |
Cheng Kam Wing |
L1 |
1 |
06:01 |
15.8 |
0.4 |
E |
70.5 |
L2 |
1 |
|||
06:19 |
15.8 |
1.7 |
E |
70.7 |
L3 |
1 |
|||
06:14 |
15.9 |
1.9 |
E |
68.9 |
|
L1 |
1 |
||
06:01 |
15.8 |
0.4 |
E |
70.5 |
L2 |
1 |
|||
06:19 |
15.8 |
1.7 |
E |
70.7 |
L3 |
1 |
Noise monitoring results in terms of Leq(5min), L10(5min) L90(5min) measured at the designated noise monitoring location are summarized in Table 9. L10(5min) and L90(5min) represent sound levels that are exceeded 10%
and 90% of the time respectively. Normally, L10(5min) measurements
can be considered as the average peak levels, whilst L90(5min) levels can be considered as the average background noise levels.
During the reporting month, the minimum and maximum average noise level measured at Yuet Wu Villa was 50.9dB(A) Leq(5min) and 55.3dB(A) Leq(5min) respectively. Summary of noise monitoring record is provided in Appendix C. The
measured monitoring results were higher than the predicted noise levels due to
the increment of noise level from ambient background noise levels.
Table 9 Noise
Monitoring Results
Date |
L10(5mins) (dB(A)) |
L90(5mins) (dB(A)) |
Leq (5mins) (dB(A)) |
Average Leq(5min) (dB(A)) |
Predicted Leq(5min) (dB(A)) |
Major Noise Source (s) |
1st December
2011 |
53.7 |
45.8 |
50.8 |
52.5 |
50 |
Vehicle passes-by along Wu Sau
Street |
56.3 |
46.3 |
52.9 |
||||
57.2 |
47.6 |
53.4 |
||||
8th
December 2011 |
52.9 |
46.2 |
50 |
50.9 |
50 |
Vehicle passes-by along Wu Sau
Street |
53.9 |
46 |
50.9 |
||||
55.2 |
45.7 |
51.6 |
||||
12th
December 2011 |
58.6 |
48.9 |
53.9 |
53.1 |
50 |
Vehicle passes-by along Wu Sau
Street |
53.8 |
46.5 |
51.6 |
||||
56.3 |
47.3 |
53.4 |
||||
22nd December
2011 |
54 |
46 |
52.3 |
52.3 |
50 |
Vehicle passes-by along Wu Sau
Street |
56.3 |
46.4 |
53.4 |
||||
54.1 |
46.8 |
50.8 |
||||
30th
December 2011 |
61.3 |
49.5 |
57.5 |
55.3 |
50 |
Vehicle passes-by along Wu Sau
Street |
57.5 |
49.3 |
54 |
||||
56.2 |
49.9 |
52.9 |
The relevant parties have implemented odour
and noise mitigation measures which shall include, but not limited to the
following:
l The WFM Complex (including the parking area)
shall be enclosed to reduce the odour nuisance to the nearby residents;
l Contract specifications on the sound power
level of mechanical ventilation system shall be followed;
l Off-route
l
All environmental mitigation measures for operational
stages stated in approved EIA Report, EM&A Manual and Environmental Permit was
carried out throughout the whole operational period as shown in Appendix D.
The environmental mitigation measures undertaken were considered adequate. There
was no major change in the operation of WFM and no additional environmental
mitigation measures shall be given. The odour patrol frequency was reviewed in
March 2011 in accordance with EM&A Manual, Section 9.2.2. The odour
monitoring shall be prolonged, which the weekly odour patrol frequency shall
persist as stated in EM&A Manual.
In the reporting
month, no non-compliance, complaint, inspection notice, notification
of summons or prosecution was received.
Environmental monitoring
has been carried out for the Joint
User Complex and Wholesale Fish Market at Area 44,
The odour intensity ratings on 1st,
8th, 12th, 22nd and 30th December were 1-No Odour. For
impact noise monitoring, the
minimum and maximum average noise level measured at Yuet Wu
Villa was 50.9dB(A) Leq(5min) and 55.3dB(A) Leq(5min) respectively. The measured monitoring results were higher than the predicted noise
levels due to the increment of noise level from ambient background noise
levels.
In the reporting
month, no non-compliance, complaint, inspection notice, notification
of summons or prosecution was received.
The operation phase EM&A programme was completed and
no further works should be carried out in future.