Issue
No. : 1
Issue
Date : December 2010
Project
No. : 768 (2)
Joint
User Complex and Wholesale Fish Market at Area 44, Tuen Mun
Environmental
Monitoring
& Audit Report for Operational Phase
(December 2010)
Prepared By:
Allied Environmental Consultants Ltd.
COMMERCIAL-IN-CONFIDENCE
Issue No. : 1
Issue Date : December 2010
Project No. : 768 (2)
Joint
User Complex and Wholesale Fish Market at Area 44, Tuen Mun
Environmental
Monitoring
& Audit Report for Operational Phase
(December 2010)
Prepared By:
Allied Environmental Consultants Ltd.
COMMERCIAL-IN-CONFIDENCE
Author:
Nic H. H. Lam
BSc(Hons) AMHKIOA
Checked: Approved:
Timothy W.H. Sze Grace M. H. Kwok
BEng(Hons) MEng BEng(Hons) MHKIEIA
MHKIOA
MISWA MIAIA MRAPA LEED AP
This report has been prepared by Allied Environmental Consultants Limited
with all reasonable skill, care and diligence within the terms of the Agreement
with the client, incorporating our General Terms and Conditions of Business and
taking account of the resources devoted to it by agreement with the client.
We disclaim any responsibility to the client and others in respect of any
matters outside the scope of the above.
This report is confidential to the client and we accept no responsibility
of whatsoever nature to third parties to whom this report, or any part thereof,
is made known. Any such party
relies upon the report at their own risk.
Table of ContentsTable of Contents i
List of Tables ii
List of Figures ii
List of Appendices ii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1
1. PROJECT BACKGROUND 2
1.1 Project Organization and Contact Personnel 2
2. SENSITIVE RECEIVERS 3
3. SUMMARY OF EM&A
REQUIREMENT 3
4. MONITORING METHODOLOGY 6
4.1 Monitoring Programme 6
4.2 Odour Patrol 6
4.3 Noise Monitoring 7
5. RESULTS 7
5.1. Operational Phase Odour Patrol 7
5.2. Noise 8
6. IMPLEMENTATION
OF MITIGATION MEASURES 9
7. Non-compliance, Complaints, Notifications of Summons and
Successful Prosecutions 9
8. CONCLUSIONS 9
Table
1 Contact Details of Key Personnel
Table 2 Action and Limit Level for Operational
Phase Odour Patrol
Table 3 Event/Action Plan for Operational Phase Odour
Patrol
Table 4 Action
and Limit Levels for Operational Phase Noise Monitoring
Table 5 Event/Action Plan for Operational Phase Odour
Patrol
Table 6 Noise Monitoring Equipments
Table 7 Results of Operational Phase Odour Patrol
Table 8 Noise Monitoring Results
Figure
1 Site
Location Plan
Figure 2 Location
Plan of Operational Phase Odour Patrol
Figure 3 Location
of Noise Monitoring Station
Figure 4 Photo
of Noise Monitoring Station
Appendix A Detail Schedule
of Monitoring Programme
Appendix
B Calibration
Certification of the Sound Level Meter and Calibrator
Appendix
C Summary and
Graphical Plot of Noise Monitoring Record
Appendix
D Mitigation Measures Implementation
Schedule for Operational Stage
Allied Environmental Consultants Limited
(AEC) has been appointed to conduct an environmental monitoring and audit
(EM&A) program for the Joint User Complex and Wholesale
Fish Market (WFM) at Area 44, Tuen Mun. The operation of the WFM was commenced
on 23rd December 2010. This report is the first monthly EM&A report for operational phase, which detailed the environmental monitoring and audit
results recorded during the period from 23rd December 2010 to 31st
December 2010.
Impact environmental monitoring for the Joint User Complex and Wholesale Fish Market at Area
44, Tuen Mun has been carried out on 29th December 2010 at
Yuet Wu Villa. Odour
and noise monitoring were conducted within the period of 0300-0630
hours.
The odour intensity
rating on 29th December 2010 was 1-No Odour.
Noise monitoring results at the monitoring
location was 54.1 dB(A).
Based on the monitoring results, the odour monitoring and
operational noise level complied with the environmental requirements in EM&A
Manual. There were no breaches of the action and limit levels.
No complaint,
inspection notice, notification of summons or prosecution was received.
A Joint User
Complex and Wholesale Fish Market (WFM Complex) at Area
The subject site is located at Castle Peak
Bay of Tuen Mun given in Figure 1. The subject site is bounded to the north by a future local
open space presently used as a temporary car park, to the east by
Key personnel and contact particulars are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1 Contact
Details of Key Personnel
Role |
Department
/ Company |
Names |
Contact
Number |
Fax
Number |
Lead User
Department |
Agriculture,
Fisheries, and Conservation Department |
Mr. K.H. Chan Ms. Louise Li |
2150 7092 2150 7104 |
2314 2866 |
Environmental
Permit Holder |
Architecture
Services Department |
Mr. S.W. Chow Ms. Rio Kwok |
2867 3716 2867 3706 |
2523 9622 |
Environmental
Team Leader |
Allied
Environmental Consultants Ltd. |
Ms. Grace
Kwok |
2815 7028 |
2815 5399 |
Independent
Environmental Checker |
Cinotech
Consultants Ltd. |
Dr. Priscilla Choy |
2151 2089 |
3107 1388 |
Air Sensitive Receivers (ASRs) within
Noise Sensitive Receivers (NSRs) within
For regular
impact monitoring, odour patrol shall be carried out on a regular basis during
the first year of operation. Odour patrol shall be carried out once a week
during the first three months of operation of the WFM. The odour patrol
frequency shall be reviewed afterwards.
According to the
approved EM&A Manual, the Action and Limit Levels for operational phase
odour patrol are summarized in Table 2.
Table 2
Action and Limit Levels for Operational Phase Odour Patrol
Parameter |
Action Level |
Limit Level |
Perceived odour intensity |
Higher than or equal to Level 3 |
Level 5 |
Incidence
of odour complaints |
Any incidence of odour complaint received |
Two or
more odour complaints received within one month |
Should non-compliance of the above Action and Limit levels occurs, the Fish Marketing Organization (FMO) shall undertake corresponding in accordance with the Event/Action Plan given in the
EM&A Manual. An Event/Action Plan for operational phase
odour monitoring is given in Table 3.
Table 3
Event/Action
Plan for Operational Phase Odour Patrol
EVENT |
ACTION |
||
WFM Management (FMO) |
AFCD |
ASD |
|
Action Level |
1.
Identify source/reason of odour nuisance or
complaint 2.
Inform AFCD 3.
Repeat odour patrol to confirm finding 4.
Discuss with AFCD on remedial actions
required |
1.
Identify the source/reason of odour nuisance
or complaint within one week 2.
Rectify any unacceptable practice 3.
Amend working method if appropriate 4.
Inform ASD if cause of nuisance or
complaint is considered to be caused by civil or E&M design problems¡¦ 5.
Implement amended working methods 6.
Contact complaintant within 10 working days
to inform the cause of nuisance and action taken |
1.
Assist AFCD to find the cause of the
complaint 2.
Modify or improve design as appropriate |
Limit Level |
1.
Identify source/reason of odour nuisance or
complaint 2.
Inform AFCD 3.
Repeat odour patrol to confirm finding 4.
Discuss with AFCD on remedial actions
required including retrofitting the scrubber system 5.
Increase odour patrol frequency to daily 6.
If the perceived odour intensity reduces,
cease additional odour patrol |
1.
Carry out investigation to identify the
source/reason of nuisance or odour complaint 2.
Rectify any unacceptable practice 3.
Amend working method if appropriate 4.
Inform ASD if cause of nuisance or
complaint is considered to be caused by civil or E&M design problems 5.
Ensure remedial measures are properly
implemented 6.
To liaise with ASD on additional odour
measures including retrofitting the scrubber system. If odour nuisance
continues, consider what portion of the work is responsible for the high
level of odour intensity and stop that portion of work until the exceedance
is abated 7.
Contact complainant within 10 days to
inform the cause of nuisance and action taken |
1.
Assist AFCD to find the cause of the
nuisance or complaint 2.
Modify or improve the design of the odour
measures including the retrofitting of scrubber system 3.
Assist AFCD to formulate remedial actions |
For noise
monitoring, the operational noise level shall be measured weekly in terms of
the A-weighted equivalent continuous sound pressure level (Leq). Leq(5min) shall be used as monitoring parameter for the period from 0300 to 0630
hours. Each set of measurement shall include at least 3 consecutive Leq(5min) results. As supplementary information for data auditing, statistical
results such as L10(5min) and L90(5min) shall also be contained for reference.
Additional noise
monitoring shall not be given for marine traffic noise. With consideration given to the selected
access route, which represent the worst-scenarios in terms of distance to
nearby receivers, the highest marine traffic noise levels at nearby sensitive
receivers are found to be below the prevailing background noise level they are
currently exposed to. The operation of the proposed WFM is not expected to
generate additional marine traffic noise within the typhoon shelter and will
not cause any deterioration to the existing noise climate in the vicinity of
the typhoon shelter.
From baseline monitoring results, the Action and Limit Levels for operational phase noise monitoring are
summarized in Table 4.
Table 4
Action and Limit Levels for Operational Phase Noise Monitoring
Time
Period |
Action
Level |
Limit Level |
All days during the night-time
(2300-0700 hours) |
When one documented compliant is received |
58dB(A) |
Should non-compliance of the above Action and Limit levels occurs, the Fish Marketing Organization (FMO) shall undertake corresponding in accordance with the Event Action Plan
given in the EM&A Manual. An
Event/Action Plan for operational
phase noise monitoring is given in Table 5.
Table 5
Event/Action
Plan for Operational Phase Noise Monitoring
EVENT |
ACTION |
||
WFM Management (FMO) |
AFCD |
ASD |
|
Action Level |
1.
Notify AFCD 2.
Identify source 3.
Discuss with AFCD and formulate remedial
measures 4.
Increase monitoring frequency to check
mitigation effectiveness |
1.
Identify the source 2.
Rectify any unacceptable practice 3.
Amend working method if appropriate 4.
Inform ASD if cause of nuisance or
complaint is considered to be caused by civil or E&M design problems¡¦ 5.
Implement amended working methods 6.
Ensure remedial measures are properly
implemented |
3.
Assist AFCD to find the cause of the exceedance 4.
Modify or improve design as appropriate |
Limit Level |
7.
Notify AFCD 8.
Identify source 9.
Repeat measurement to confirm finding 10.
Increase monitoring frequency 11.
Discuss with AFCD and formulate remedial
measures 12.
Assess effectiveness of the remedial
actions 13.
If exceedance stops, cease additional monitoring |
8.
Carry out investigation to identify the
source 9.
Rectify any unacceptable practice 10.
Amend working method if appropriate 11.
Inform ASD if cause of nuisance or
complaint is considered to be caused by civil or E&M design problems 12.
Implement amended working methods 13.
Ensure remedial measures are properly
implemented 14.
If exceedance continues, consider what
portion of the work is responsible and stop that portion of work until the
exceedance is abated |
4.
Assist AFCD to find the cause of the exceedance 5.
Modify or improve the design as appropriate 6.
Assist AFCD to formulate remedial actions |
Odour patrol
was
conducted around Yuet Wu Villa and noise monitoring was conducted at Block 15, Yuet
Wu Villa on 29th December 2010. Appendix A displayed the detail schedule of the monitoring programme.
Odour patrol shall be conducted to
investigate if there is any potential for odour nuisance due to the operation
of the Wholesale Fish Market. The patrol shall be carried out by a team of at
least two personnel during the peak hours for trading operation at the WFM from
3:00 to 6:30 a.m.
The area covered by the odour patrol shall
include Air Sensitive Receivers in the vicinity of the WFM, namely Yuet Wu
Villa. The location plan of odour patrol is shown in Figure 2.
During the patrol, the patrol officers shall
identify if there was any odour characterised of that emitted from the WFM and
assess the intensity of the odour perceived individually. The following odour
intensity rating shall be adopted in the assessment:
1.
-
no odour
2.
-
not unpleasant
3.
-
slightly unpleasant
4.
-
unpleasant
5.
-
very unpleasant
Mean value of the odour intensity ratings
assessed by the patrol team shall be reported. Location of odour assessment,
temperature, wind speed, wind direction, relative humidity and time of patrol
shall also be recorded.
If the mean odour intensity rating was higher
than or equal to level 3, the patrol officers should investigate from where the
odour was originated and identify the source of odour emission, if possible.
Noise monitoring was conducted
at the designated noise monitoring location between 0700-1900 hours using a sound
level meter which complies with the International Electrotechnical Commission
Publications 651:1979 (Type 1) and 804:1985 (Type 1). Noise instrumentation
details are given in Table 6 and the Calibration Certificate for the sound level meter
and calibrator is given in Appendix B. Noise monitoring was conducted at
Table 6 Noise
Monitoring Equipments
Manufacturer |
Type/Model
No. |
Equipment |
Svantek |
Svan-959 |
Precision
Sound Level Analyser with windshield |
Svantek |
SV-30A |
Sound Level Calibrator |
Noise level measurements
were recorded in terms of thirty minutes A-weighted equivalent continuous sound
pressure level (Leq(5min)) on
a weekly basis. The sound level meter was calibrated immediately prior to and
following each noise measurement. The meter was mounted on a tripod at a height
of
Noise measurements were not made in the presence of fog, rain, and wind
with a steady speed exceeding
Results of
operational phase odour patrol are summarized
in Table 7. The odour
intensity rating on 29th December 2010 was 1-No Odour.
Table 7 Results of Operational Phase Odour Patrol
Date and Time |
Location |
Temperature (¢J) |
Wind Speed
(m/s) |
Wind Direction |
Relative Humidity (%) |
Personnel |
Odour Intensity Rating |
29th December 2010 04:50 ¡V 05:30 am |
Yuet Wu Villa |
20 |
1.25 |
NW |
65 |
Cheng Kam Wing |
1 |
Tsui Churh Yiu |
1 |
Noise monitoring results in terms of Leq(5min), L10(5min) L90(5min) measured at the designated noise monitoring location are summarized in Table 8. L10(5min) and L90(5min) represent sound levels that are exceeded 10%
and 90% of the time respectively. Normally, L10(5min) measurements
can be considered as the average peak levels, whilst L90(5min) levels can be considered as the average background noise levels.
During the reporting month, the minimum and maximum noise level measured at Yuet Wu Villa was 53.3dB(A) Leq(5min) and 54.7dB(A) Leq(30min) respectively with an average of 54.1dB(A) Leq(5min). No exceedance was recorded in this reporting period. Summary of noise monitoring record is provided in Appendix C. The
measured monitoring results were below the baseline monitoring results and they
were higher than the predicted noise levels due to the increment of noise level
from ambient background noise levels.
Table 8 Noise
Monitoring Results
Date |
L10(5mins) (dB(A)) |
L90(5mins) (dB(A)) |
Leq (5mins) (dB(A)) |
Average
Leq(5min)
(dB(A)) |
Predicted
Leq(5min)
(dB(A)) |
29th December 2010 |
58.9 |
47.1 |
54.7 |
54.1 |
50 |
57.4 |
48.2 |
54.2 |
|||
56.5 |
47.2 |
53.3 |
The relevant parties has implemented odour
and noise mitigation measures which shall include, but not limited to the
following:
l The WFM Complex (including the parking area)
shall be enclosed to reduce the odour nuisance to the nearby residents;
l Contract specifications on the sound power
level of mechanical ventilation system shall be followed;
l Off-route lorries shall not pass along the Wu
Shan Road outside Yuet Wu Villa;
l Lorries queuing and vessel¡¦s horning shall be
controlled by WFM management and AFCD.
All environmental mitigation measures for operational stages stated in approved EIA Report,
EM&A Manual and Environmental Permit shall be carried out throughout the
whole operational period as
shown in Appendix
D.
No complaint, inspection notice,
notification of summons or prosecution was received.
Environmental monitoring
has been carried out for the Joint
User Complex and Wholesale Fish Market at Area 44, Tuen Mun. Odour patrol and noise monitoring were conducted Yuet Wu Villa during the period from 23rd December 2010 to 31st
December 2010.
The odour intensity rating on 29th
December 2010 was 1-No Odour. For impact noise monitoring,
the average Leq(30min)
is 54.1dB(A). All monitoring
results complied with the relevant action and limit levels. The measured monitoring results were below the baseline monitoring
results and they were higher than the predicted noise levels due to the
increment of noise level from ambient background noise levels.
No complaint, inspection notice, notification of summons or prosecution
was received.